Car Fire; Crews Seen Lifting up Hood, Hosing Down Vehicle
64-22 Wetherole St, Rego Park, Queens
Published · Updated
Watch Live Videos
Download Citizen
Summary
- Firefighters responded to and are working to extinguish a car fire on Wetherole Street in Flushing, New York.
Timeline
Firefighters are working to extinguish a burning vehicle.
A 911 caller has reported an unconfirmed incident at 64-22 Wetherole St.
Firefighters are working to extinguish a burning vehicle.
A 911 caller has reported an unconfirmed incident at 64-22 Wetherole St.
Firefighters are working to extinguish a burning vehicle.
A 911 caller has reported an unconfirmed incident at 64-22 Wetherole St.
Firefighters are working to extinguish a burning vehicle.
A 911 caller has reported an unconfirmed incident at 64-22 Wetherole St.
Firefighters are working to extinguish a burning vehicle.
A 911 caller has reported an unconfirmed incident at 64-22 Wetherole St.
Stay up-to-date
Download CitizenRadio Clips
Comments19
Making me dizzy!
Lol
No it wasn’t insurance purposes I met with the owner of the car after fire department left. The owner wasn’t around when the fires started . The owner came after the fire had started and stated that the car was just fine but not sure why the fire even started. Pls don’t assume it was just for insurance purposes.
What we really need are stricter and more comprehensive car fire laws!!!
Worst camera man ever.
Making me dizzy!
Lol
No it wasn’t insurance purposes I met with the owner of the car after fire department left. The owner wasn’t around when the fires started . The owner came after the fire had started and stated that the car was just fine but not sure why the fire even started. Pls don’t assume it was just for insurance purposes.
What we really need are stricter and more comprehensive car fire laws!!!
Worst camera man ever.
Making me dizzy!
Lol
No it wasn’t insurance purposes I met with the owner of the car after fire department left. The owner wasn’t around when the fires started . The owner came after the fire had started and stated that the car was just fine but not sure why the fire even started. Pls don’t assume it was just for insurance purposes.
What we really need are stricter and more comprehensive car fire laws!!!
Worst camera man ever.
Making me dizzy!
Lol
No it wasn’t insurance purposes I met with the owner of the car after fire department left. The owner wasn’t around when the fires started . The owner came after the fire had started and stated that the car was just fine but not sure why the fire even started. Pls don’t assume it was just for insurance purposes.
What we really need are stricter and more comprehensive car fire laws!!!
Worst camera man ever.
Stay informed on local incidents
Download Citizen
Making me dizzy!
Lol
No it wasn’t insurance purposes I met with the owner of the car after fire department left. The owner wasn’t around when the fires started . The owner came after the fire had started and stated that the car was just fine but not sure why the fire even started. Pls don’t assume it was just for insurance purposes.
What we really need are stricter and more comprehensive car fire laws!!!
Worst camera man ever.